It’s probably also worth pointing out that the Nobel laureate was arguing from squashed’s position, not correlationstonone’s. Interestingly, C2N’s argument is not invalidated by the research. I was just pointing out a bit of trivia. Also, I happened to be discussing the research with a professor yesterday and used the rocket scientist vs. burger flipper example. Our discussion followed much the same course as the squashed-C2N conversation, except we were a little geekier about it (“and it’s rather obvious that this friction constant is not constant. The implications of nonlinearity …”).
